The third strategy was an attempt was made to establish a defensive line in the north along the Sombre river bridge maps, Berlaimont/Maubeuge/Thuin/Charleroi. Eventually the centre collapsed with elite Axis battle groups crushing the Allies, most notably the Axis IR GD unit. To counter the AI making unplanned moves for the Allies, some movements were cancelled in favour of staying put. Miscommunication errors resulted in battlegroups attacking, retreating or abandoning maps that they were not ordered to. Towards mid campaign the second strategy was employed to move battlegroups from the south to the centre in order to dull the breakout. The first strategy remained the same after losing the bridge maps but more emphasis was put on tactics in order to preserve infantry as the Axis began to break though the centre. Once a defensive positions was untenable, Allies would pull back or do a one team disband. Defending the bridge maps as long as possible was key to the strategy. Axis had overwhelming odds with the massive amount of infantry and equipment, Allied defeat was inevitable, winning attrition was the Allies only option. The first strategy was to make it as painful as possible for the Axis to advance west. Grand Strategy - Four key strategies were employed by the Allies. Many of the battles could be watched live from both German and French perspective. More than 400 battles were recorded and livestreamed, most of which you can replay at the Meuse Playlist on YouTube. After more than 400 multiplayer battles the Axis achieved a minor victory on 18 May Midday Turn 2, Allies surrendered on turn 19 May Night. The Meuse Team Grand Campaign started 31 October 2020 has ended 12 February 2021. Posted by webmaster on Mon 10:00 am ( Read More. Meuse Team Grand Campaign Finished - Axis Minor Victory! If you have not registered, please click here. The study concluded that a lot more fine-tuning needs to go into fighting online harassment.You are not logged in. And even though most emails ended up in the trash bin as unwanted messages, few email addresses were blacklisted, likely because a complete blacklist of a contact was too extreme a measure. The MIT study also found that moderators eventually got tired of checking other people’s emails and had slower response times. The study also mentioned that moderators reading harassment could potentially face “psychological risks,” which raises questions about how feasible of a solution this is. “Moderating is a lot of work,” one anonymous moderator said in the study. More importantly, moderating put stress on the volunteers. MIT noted, “the use of friends as moderators simplifies issues surrounding privacy and personalization but also presents challenges for relationship maintenance.” Email account owners also felt guilty they were leaning on their friends for so much help and began to grow reluctant to ask for more favors. While the service might help Squadbox account holders, it’s far from a perfect solution. Moderators reading harassment could potentially face “psychological risks” Squadbox currently only works with email, but the team behind it hopes to eventually expand to other social media platforms. “This line of work helps provide a map for one hybrid solution to harassment that augments human support with tools in a meaningful way,” said professor of information from the University of Michigan Clifford Lampe in a press release. Squadbox also scores each message’s toxicity level to help moderators when vetting emails. They’ll also have tools at their disposal: the ability to create whitelists for pre-approved email senders, and blacklists for senders who should be automatically rejected. Her “squad” of two will divvy up the work between themselves and ensure her inbox stays clean. So a blogger who wants to have a public email address to receive tips, but also wants to avoid receiving hate mail from strangers, can set up a Squadbox account, and use two of her co-workers as moderators, MIT scientists propose. The tool is called Squadbox, and it “friend-sources” for moderators to filter messages and support people who are being harassed online. It proposes that instead of relying on platforms’ moderators, people start relying on their friends. In light of Facebook, Twitter, Discord, and other social media platforms’ struggles to combat online harassment, MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory has developed a new tool that might help.